Case 3200308/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thomas Chew v Boleyn Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200308/2019
- Decision date
- 18 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thomas Chew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 3 June 2019 before Employment Judge Foxwell, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The judgment records claims for age discrimination, sex discrimination, and disability discrimination.
The tribunal did not make findings on the merits of those claims. Instead, it recorded that the claimant withdrew them, and the judgment therefore states that they were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive liability findings or legal tests are set out in the short judgment.
No remedy or award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.