Case 3200312/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Yunas v Mont Rose College — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200312/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Yunas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Yunas brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Mont Rose College. Employment Judge Gardiner recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required not less than two years' service in order to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years. On that basis, it held that she was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint and struck it out. The claimant had been given an opportunity to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out, but failed to do so.
The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required at least two years' service for an unfair dismissal complaint. It found the claimant had less than two years' service and had not given an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.