Case 3200313/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Madzikanda v Greenacre Care Services Ltd - In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200313/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Madzikanda
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's liquidator stated that it did not intend to defend the case. Proceeding under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Prichard entered judgment for the claimant on the money claims before the tribunal.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for holiday pay, arrears of pay, notice pay and sick pay succeeded. It awarded £2,132.60 for holiday pay, £319.89 for arrears of pay, £2,132.60 for notice pay and £188.50 for sick pay, stated as gross figures.
The total sum ordered to be paid was £4,773.59 gross. The hearing listed for 30 August 2019 was vacated and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,133 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment described this claim as "arrears of pay" and awarded £319.89 gross. | Upheld | — | £320 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment described this claim as "notice pay" and awarded £2,132.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,133 |
| Other | Judgment described this claim as "sick pay" and awarded £188.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £189 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,774
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.