Case 3200315/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ahmed v MTR Corporation Crossrail Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200315/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform at East London Hearing Centre on 21 July 2021 before Employment Judge B Elgot. The claimant, Mr A Ahmed, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by counsel, Mr O Lawrence. The judgment records that the claimant did not respond to telephone or email enquiries about his failure to attend.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the Employment Judge considered the information available and the enquiries made about the claimant's absence. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims. No substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims are recorded in the judgment.
The judgment does not record any remedy, liability apportionment, or award. It is a procedural dismissal based on non-attendance rather than a determination of the underlying employment disputes.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to enquiries about his absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to enquiries about his absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to enquiries about his absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to enquiries about his absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not respond to enquiries about his absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.