Case 3200316/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Torres v GLS Architects International Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200316/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Torres
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the claim of Ms A Torres against Gls Architects. The tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 2 January 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with paragraph 8 of the Preliminary Hearing Order dated 22 May 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing explaining why strike out should not follow. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action beyond referring to 'the claim'; this classification follows the gov.uk case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.