Case 3200317/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mikans v The Co-operative Retail Logistics — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200317/2024
- Decision date
- 9 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rakhim
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mikans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the correct identity of the respondent was The Co-operative Group Limited. It then held that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and that it was also not presented within a further reasonable period, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with a discrimination claim. On the wording in the extracted judgment, the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The discrimination claim was therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was also not presented within a further reasonable period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment refers only to a discrimination claim and does not specify the protected characteristic or type of discrimination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.