Case 3200345/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Brewer v Serco Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200345/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Brewer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing. After enquiries by telephone, email, and checking whether he had attended in person, the tribunal proceeded in his absence, taking account of the available ET1, correspondence, and the respondent's evidence.
The tribunal found that the claimant was directly employed by Serco Limited from 15 April 2019 until his dismissal on 6 January 2021. Before that date he had worked regularly as an agency worker supplied through agency arrangements. Although he worked under the respondent's day-to-day direction and was integrated into its work, the tribunal found that those facts were consistent with the agency arrangements and it was not necessary to imply a contract of employment with the respondent before 15 April 2019.
On that basis the claimant had less than two years' continuous service, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal also considered whether the ET1 or later correspondence contained any other claim, including under the Equality Act 2010, but concluded that the only claim included was unfair dismissal. The claim was therefore struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' continuous service and therefore it had no jurisdiction to entertain the unfair dismissal claim as presented; the ET1 was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 212 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Tilson v Alstom Transport
- James v Greenwich London Borough Council
- Cable and Wireless plc v Muscat
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.