Case 3200349/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Baker v Harmetic Composites — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200349/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone final hearing on 5 October 2020, neither party attended and neither party was represented. The tribunal also recorded that neither party complied with the case management orders made by Employment Judge Burgher on 13 July 2020.
The judgment states that the claimant's ET1 failed to set out what he claimed or the legal basis for any such claim. On that basis, and pursuant to rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Employment Judge John Crosfill dismissed the claimant's claims in the judgment dated 7 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim(s) or legal basis in the ET1; it records only that the claimant failed to set out what he claimed or the legal basis for any claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.