Case 3200351/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Kaliniceva v Mm & Gs Food Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200351/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Kaliniceva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in the case of Miss J Kaliniceva v MM & GS Food Ltd. The Tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 11 June 2019 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing to explain why strike out should not follow. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37.
The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of any discrimination or unfair dismissal allegations, and it records no monetary award. The decision was issued by Regional Employment Judge Taylor on 15 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the merits of any substantive claim. It states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 11 June 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.