Case 3200352/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Asare - Bediako v Avo Distribution Group Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200352/2024
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittall Representation
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Asare - Bediako
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Avo Distribution Group Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The judgment records claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, identified as unpaid wages and holiday pay, and breach of contract, identified as failure to pay pension contributions.
The unauthorised deduction from wages claim, including holiday pay, was dismissed upon withdrawal. The breach of contract claim was also dismissed upon withdrawal, with the judgment noting that the claimant intended to pursue the pension contributions matter with the Pensions Regulator.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim, namely unpaid wages and holiday pay, was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment includes holiday pay within the unauthorised deduction from wages claim and states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim, namely failure to pay pension contributions, was dismissed upon withdrawal because the claimant intended to pursue the matter with the Pensions Regulator. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.