Case 3200354/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Masseratti-Goodge v Essex County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200354/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Masseratti-Goodge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Claimant's Equality Act 2010 claims for indirect discrimination under sections 19 and 39, and reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment states that the Claimant's other claims are unaffected by this judgment. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claims under sections 19 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 for indirect discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The protected characteristic is inferred from the disability discrimination listing and reasonable adjustments claim context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claims under sections 20, 21 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 for reasonable adjustments were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 19 Equality Act 2010
- Section 39 Equality Act 2010
- Sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.