Mr T Boswell v JR Nagra Limited — 2020

Case reference: 3200359/2020
Decision date: 1 July 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr T Boswell

Respondent

JR Nagra Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal held that Mr T Boswell’s complaint that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 was well-founded. It made a declaration to that effect against JR Nagra Limited.

The judgment records an order that the respondent pay £2,769.33. The text itemises that sum as £2,348 in unpaid holiday pay and £361.33 described as an ACAS uplift of 15% for failure to follow a grievance procedure. The extracted figures do not fully reconcile arithmetically, so the award is recorded on the basis stated in the judgment, with the inconsistency noted.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that the complaint under section 13 was well-founded. It orders payment of £2,769.33, but the itemised figures in the text (£2,348 and £361.33) sum to £2,709.33 rather than £2,769.33.	Upheld	—	£2,769

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,769; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.