Case 3200362/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr M Stafford (2) Mr L Molloy v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200362/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr M Stafford (2) Mr L Molloy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr Stafford and Mr Molloy were among 125 employees employed at the Second Respondent's Bow location who were entitled to a protective award following an earlier judgment in case number 3202653/2019 and others, issued on 13 October 2020.
The tribunal found that neither claimant had been paid the protective award. It ordered the First Respondent to pay Mr Stafford £6,731.03, representing 90 days' pay, and Mr Molloy £6,999.00, also representing 90 days' pay, in respect of their protective award entitlements.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment concerns unpaid protective award entitlements for two claimants: £6,731.03 for Mr Stafford and £6,999.00 for Mr Molloy. Protective award is not a distinct locked taxonomy option, so classified as other rather than redundancy_pay. | Upheld | — | £13,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,730
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.