Case 3200367/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Majid Iqbal v Jadex Property Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200367/2024
- Decision date
- 5 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Illing Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Majid Iqbal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 5 August 2024, before Employment Judge Illing, the tribunal found that Mr Majid Iqbal’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Jadex Property Limited was well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages from 1 December 2023 and that the deduction was ongoing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £14,512.68 gross, being the sum due to the date of the hearing. It also ordered payment of £403.13 gross per week until the contract of employment is terminated in accordance with the contract terms. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on the sums paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages ongoing from 1 December 2023. It ordered payment of £14,512.68 gross to the date of the hearing and £403.13 gross per week until the contract of employment is terminated in accordance with its terms. | Upheld | — | £14,513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.