Case 3200369/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Aslam v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200369/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Panel members
- Mr T Brown, Ms M Daniels
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Aslam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, including the allegation that the dismissal was automatically unfair contrary to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also dismissed the protected disclosure detriment claims brought under sections 47B and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claim, which was based on the contention that she should have been paid at the rate applicable to an Assistant Manager.
The claim for payment for accrued but untaken annual leave under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was resolved by agreement. Without any admission of liability, the respondent agreed to pay £501.38, the Tribunal ordered payment of that sum by consent, and the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim, including the claim that the dismissal was automatically unfair contrary to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996, was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claims for detriments on the grounds that the claimant made protected disclosures contrary to sections 47B and 48 Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages, based on alleged entitlement to the rate applicable to an Assistant Manager, was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The annual leave claim under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998 was resolved by agreement without admission of liability, with a consent order for payment of £501.38, and was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | £501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £501
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Sections 47B and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.