Case 3200374/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Phillipe Francis v Ford Retail Limited trading as Trust Ford — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200374/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Phillipe Francis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone at East London Hearing Centre on 22 June 2020 before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone. The claimant, Mr Phillipe Francis, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor, Mr W Smith.
The judgment records proceedings in respect of unfair dismissal, notice pay, and non-payment of redundancy pay. It states that these proceedings were dismissed following the withdrawal of the claims by the claimant.
No findings on the substantive merits of the claims are recorded in the judgment, and no monetary award or remedy is set out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that this claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a notice pay claim (i.e. breach of contract) and states it was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states this claim for non-payment of redundancy pay was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.