Case 3200387/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Barking v Dagenham College — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200387/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Barking
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 22 June 2020 before Employment Judge Massarella. The judgment records Ms M. Thomas as the claimant and Barking v Dagenham College as the respondent.
The only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment is that the claimant’s claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability are set out because the claim did not proceed to determination on its merits.
The judgment does not record any monetary award, and no split remedy is given for the claim. It also does not record any discrimination finding, panel members, or legal test beyond the Rule 52 reference associated with withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.