Case 3200391/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Mbugua v Clarity Housing Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200391/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Mbugua
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Clarity Housing Limited made an unauthorised deduction from Mr I Mbugua's wages on termination of employment. It ordered the Respondent to pay £350 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, it ordered the Respondent to pay £1,600, described in the judgment as four weeks' pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on termination and ordered payment of £350. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Other | The tribunal found the Respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment and made an award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 of four weeks' pay, quantified at £1,600. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,950
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.