Case 3200396/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Bullici v Financial Ombudsman Service Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200396/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Bullici
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out for lack of the necessary two years' qualifying service.
At the preliminary hearing on 29 June 2020, the claimant accepted that she lacked the two years' qualifying service. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 11 to 13 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant accepted she lacked the necessary two years' qualifying service. Other claims were noted as remaining listed for a later hearing and were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.