Case 3200410/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Metcalf v Farr Engineering Services Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200410/2024
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Metcalf
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for hearing on 28 August 2024 before Employment Judge Crosfill at East London Hearing Centre, by CVP. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended or was represented. The judgment records that the claimant had filed no evidence in support of his claims in accordance with the hearing directions, and that the clerk unsuccessfully attempted to contact him twice on the telephone number provided.
Pursuant to Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for a statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, and arrears of wages. The judgment does not record any findings on the underlying merits of those claims and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this claim only as 'notice pay'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this claim as 'arrears of wages'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.