Case 3200420/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Khatun v East End Medical Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200420/2022
- Decision date
- 16 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Wilkinson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Khatun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Khatun brought a constructive unfair dismissal claim against East End Medical Centre. A disability discrimination claim had been withdrawn at the start of the hearing after a prior deposit order, and the tribunal proceeded with the unfair dismissal claim alone before Employment Judge S Wilkinson.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not proved she was bullied by Mrs Shaikh or that the respondent failed to respond reasonably to her complaints. It accepted that there had been an incident on 24 May 2021, but found that Mrs Shaikh thereafter checked on the claimant’s health, the partners held meetings about the dispute, a grievance process was carried out, and support was offered when the claimant indicated she needed help with her workload. The payslip error was accepted as an innocent mistake, and the tribunal found that the claimant had not requested an Occupational Health referral.
Applying the constructive dismissal test in Western Excavating v Sharp, the tribunal held that none of the matters relied on by the claimant amounted to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. It also found no evidential basis for attributing the claimant’s asthma flare-ups to the respondent’s conduct. Because no breach was proved, the questions of causation and affirmation did not arise, and the constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found no bullying, no failure to investigate the grievance, no failure to make adjustments, and no repudiatory breach of contract. The claimant resigned on 29 October 2021, but not in response to a breach found proved by the tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | This claim had previously been subject to a deposit order and was withdrawn at the start of the hearing. The judge dismissed it at the outset after the withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.95 ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp [1978] ICR 221
- repudiatory breach of contract
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.