Case 3200448/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McMullen v Old Street Brewery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200448/2023
- Decision date
- 8 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McMullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M McMullen brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and failure to pay holiday pay against Old Street Brewery Ltd. The respondent did not attend the hearing or present a defence, but the tribunal was satisfied that the claim and notice of hearing had been served and that it had enough evidence from the claimant's sworn evidence and documents to determine the case.
The tribunal found that Mr McMullen had been employed from 15 November 2021 as Creative Director on a salary of £35,000, working 39 hours over 15 days per month, and that his employment ended on 5 January 2023. It found that he had not been paid for November and December 2022. It also accepted that he had produced WhatsApp messages with Adam Green of the respondent, and that the respondent had made two payments earlier in the year totalling £1,575 as part-payment.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations, the tribunal held that there had been unlawful deductions from wages and that the claimant was entitled to holiday pay. It calculated his net monthly pay at about £2,295.47, awarded £2,295.47 for November 2022 and £2,295.47 for December 2022, and added holiday pay of about £2,000.00. The judgment records a total entitlement of £6,590.94 before crediting the £1,575 already paid, and the tribunal ordered payment of the outstanding balance of £5,015.94 immediately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid wages for November and December 2022. It recorded that £1,575 had already been paid as part-payment, and it calculated the unpaid monthly wages at £2,295.47 for each of those two months. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment in lieu of untaken annual leave under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations. The reasons say he was entitled to 25 days holiday pay, but the remedy section refers to '20 days annual leave' at £2,000.00, so the days figure is internally inconsistent. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,016
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 16 Working Time Regulations
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.