Case 3200460/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Lazenby v Sky Handling Partner Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200460/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Members
- Panel members
- Ms C Anderson, Ms R Hewitt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Lazenby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 21, 22 and 23 September 2021 before Employment Judge C Lewis with Ms C Anderson and Ms R Hewitt as members. In a unanimous judgment, it dismissed the claimant's constructive dismissal claim and dismissed her disability discrimination complaint alleging a failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that her refusal of the respondent's offer of suitable alternative employment was not unreasonable. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment does not record any separate discrimination compensation because that claim failed.
Remedy was limited to statutory and contractual payments. The claimant was awarded a redundancy payment of £5,824.00, calculated as 15.5 weeks' pay at £375.75, and notice pay of £4,509 gross payable net after deductions for tax and national insurance. The total award recorded in the judgment was £10,333.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's constructive dismissal claim fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for disability discrimination by failing to make a reasonable adjustment fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that her refusal of the respondent's offer of suitable alternative employment was not unreasonable; redundancy payment awarded at £5,824.00. | Upheld | — | £5,824 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay of £4,509 gross was awarded, payable net after deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £4,509 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.