Case 3200460/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Daria Kopec v Colchester Boutique Hotel Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200460/2022
- Decision date
- 26 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daria Kopec
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely on 26 May 2022 before Employment Judge Travers. Neither party attended. The respondent had emailed the tribunal on 16 May 2022 acknowledging liability to the claimant in the sum of £309.71 and stating that it wished to settle the matter immediately.
The tribunal office contacted the claimant on the day of the hearing, and she said that she had now been paid. In light of that, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment does not record any separate award, remedy calculation, or legal test applied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | On 16 May 2022 the respondent emailed the tribunal saying it acknowledged liability in the sum of £309.71 and wanted to settle immediately. At the hearing on 26 May 2022 neither party attended; the claimant was contacted by the tribunal office and said she had now been paid. In those circumstances, the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.