Case 3200461/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Bello v Total Security Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200461/2021
- Decision date
- 22 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Bello
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr E Bello's claim against Total Security Services. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 13 September 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons identified in the judgment were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 4 May 2021, the claim had not been actively pursued, and the claimant had failed to attend the hearing on 27 September 2021. The judgment does not record any separate findings on the pleaded age discrimination, race discrimination, breach of contract, or unlawful deduction from wages matters listed in the case context.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment also records that the hearing fixed for 23, 24 and 25 November 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; the age discrimination classification is from the gov.uk listing category supplied with the case context. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; the race discrimination classification is from the gov.uk listing category supplied with the case context. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; the breach of contract classification is from the gov.uk listing category supplied with the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The judgment text does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; the unlawful deduction from wages classification is from the gov.uk listing category supplied with the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.