Case 3200463/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Craze & Others v Westex Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200463/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss T Craze & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that 70 employees employed by Westex Ltd at its Harlow location were entitled to a declaration that Westex Ltd failed to inform or consult them in respect of redundancies that took place within a period of 90 days. The employees were therefore entitled to a protective award.
No reason was advanced to mitigate the 90-day protective award period. The Tribunal considered it just and equitable to award the maximum period of 90 days, with the protected period beginning on 19 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment declares that Westex Ltd failed to inform or consult 70 employees in respect of redundancies and that those employees are entitled to a protective award. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award or collective consultation category, so this is classified as other. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.