Case 3200481/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200481/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment supplied is a short interlocutory decision for case numbers 3200481/2023 and 3200608/2023. Employment Judge Jones recorded that the Claimant is a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and was so at the relevant time.
Under Rule 50(3)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal ordered that until the end of the liability hearing the names of the Claimant, the Respondent and the Claimant's children would not be disclosed to the public by use of anonymisation. The order was stated to apply in hearings, listings and documents prepared for the liability hearing.
The supplied text does not record any substantive liability findings, dismissal, remedy assessment, or final outcome on the underlying discrimination claims. It is therefore limited to the disability status finding and the anonymity direction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text contains only an anonymity order under Rule 50(3)(b) and a statement that the Claimant is a disabled person for Equality Act 2010 purposes at the relevant time. No substantive liability findings or remedy are set out in the supplied text. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 50(3)(b) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.