Case 3200490/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Hussain v Lea Interchange Bus Company Limited T/A Stagecoach London — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200490/2024
- Decision date
- 15 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Hussain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a bus driver from 16 August 2023 until he was dismissed for gross misconduct on 30 January 2024. Two tribunal claims were presented. The first, case number 3200490/2024, was later confirmed by the claimant to have been incorrectly submitted, and the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal.
The second claim, case number 3200552/2024, was framed in the ET1 and later correspondence as a breach of contract or breach of procedures complaint. The claimant referred to alleged failures in the disciplinary and grievance process, including an ignored appeal, no investigation, involvement of a manager in an investigation, and a grievance said to relate to racial abuse. The respondent understood that no discrimination complaint was being made, and the claimant did not contradict that understanding.
The tribunal found that the substance of the second claim was a challenge to the fairness of the disciplinary process leading to dismissal. It held that there was no freestanding ability to bring claims for breach of the ACAS code or disciplinary/grievance procedures, that no other contractual claim was identified, and that no discrimination claim had been brought. Because the claimant had less than two years' service, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim and struck the claim out for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim number 3200490/2024 was withdrawn after the claimant confirmed by email and letter that it had been incorrectly submitted and asked for it to be cancelled. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim number 3200552/2024 was pleaded as a breach of procedures/breach of contract claim, but the tribunal held that its substance was a challenge to the fairness of the disciplinary process and dismissal. It was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim; the tribunal also found no other complaint within its jurisdiction, and no discrimination claim was brought. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.3 Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 art. 3(c)
- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.