Case 3200498/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G. Alexander-Wight v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200498/2019
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G. Alexander-Wight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought claims described as constructive (unfair) dismissal, breach of contract for notice pay, a redundancy payment, holiday pay and other payments. The Respondent resisted the claims in their entirety. The case was listed for a three-day full merits hearing beginning on 21 August 2019.
Before the hearing, the Claimant made two postponement applications. The first relied on High Court proceedings concerning Nursing and Midwifery Council decisions and was refused. The second relied on medical evidence concerning suspected sciatica. The Tribunal found that the available medical evidence did not support the Claimant's assertion that she was not fit to prepare for or attend the hearing, and the hearing remained listed.
The Claimant did not attend the hearing, did not provide a witness statement, and did not respond to telephone enquiries or further correspondence. The Tribunal considered whether to proceed in her absence or adjourn, but found that the constructive dismissal claim could not properly be determined without her evidence and that relisting would cause delay and further burden. The Tribunal dismissed the claims under rule 47 because the Claimant neither attended nor was represented at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim was described as constructive (unfair) dismissal and was dismissed under rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'other payments' in addition to holiday pay; the precise payments are unclear from the extracted judgment text. The claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 47, schedule 1 of the ETs (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Roberts v Skelmersdale College [2004] IRLR 69
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.