Case 3200507/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Samms v KG Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200507/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Samms
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross, sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre, found in favour of Miss J Samms on four employment claims against KG Group Limited. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2019, had breached the contract of employment by failing to pay notice pay, had failed to pay holiday pay for 6 days of holiday owed but untaken at the date of dismissal, and had failed to pay redundancy pay where the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The judgment records a total award of £4,512.96. This was assessed as £3,000 for unpaid wages, £313 for damages for breach of contract, £276.92 for holiday pay, and £923.04 for redundancy pay. The respondent did not appear or be represented at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2019. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract by failing to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | £313 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday pay was owing in respect of 6 days of holiday owed but untaken at the date of dismissal. | Upheld | — | £277 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £923 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.