Case 3200507/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K D’Ambrosio v Rotable Repairs Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200507/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K D’Ambrosio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the liability hearing in East London on 27 and 28 August 2020, before Employment Judge Gardiner, the tribunal held that Mr K D’Ambrosio’s claim for unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The respondent was Rotable Repairs Limited. The judgment records that the tribunal considered the claimant’s case in person and the respondent’s case represented by its Accounts & HR Manager, Mrs T Gunn.
The tribunal assessed that there was a 60% chance the claimant would have been dismissed even if a fair process had been followed. It also found that the dismissal was contributed to by the claimant’s actions, and stated that any compensation due should be reduced by 50% under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 having regard to that finding.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that a Remedy Hearing would take place on 3 December 2020 by Cloud Video Platform, with a time estimate of one day, to determine the remedy due to the claimant, including whether any compensatory award should be adjusted under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. It also made case management directions for updated schedules of loss, witness statements, and documents to be exchanged before that hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded. No monetary remedy was fixed in this judgment; remedy was listed for a later hearing on 3 December 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 122(2) and 123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.