Case 3200507/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Nicholls v Wyncroft Surgery (A Partnership) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200507/2023
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Nicholls
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 9 May 2023, Employment Judge Beyzade heard Ms K Nicholls's application for interim relief against Wyncroft Surgery (A Partnership). The written judgment records that oral reasons had been given at the hearing and that the claimant's application for interim relief was refused.
The judgment also amends the respondent's title to Wyncroft Surgery (A Partnership) and records that case management orders were issued separately. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's reasoning for refusing interim relief, and it does not finally determine any underlying whistleblowing or unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records only that the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was refused. The written reasons do not determine the underlying whistleblowing or unfair dismissal complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.