Case 3200509/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sellick v KG Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200509/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Sellick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 14 June 2019 before Employment Judge Ross, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent neither present nor represented, the Tribunal upheld the Claimant's wage, contract, holiday pay, and redundancy claims against KG Group Limited. It found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages between 1 January 2019 and 18 March 2019, had breached the contract by failing to pay notice pay, and had failed to pay holiday pay for 4 days of holiday owed but untaken at the date of dismissal.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. It ordered the Respondent to pay a total of £13,806.27, made up of £3,970.50 for unpaid wages, £408.97 for damages for breach of contract, £292.30 for holiday pay, and £9,134.50 for redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages between 1 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. | Upheld | — | £3,971 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found a breach of contract in failing to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | £409 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found holiday pay was due for 4 days of untaken holiday at the date of dismissal. | Upheld | — | £292 |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal found the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £9,135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,806
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.