Case 3200509/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Edgar Znutins v Oyster One Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3200509/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Misra K.C.
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Edgar Znutins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Claimant withdrew the claim for an unauthorised deduction of wages consisting of a week's pay for the period 23 to 30 December 2023, and that claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The remaining unauthorised deduction of wages claim was found to be well founded only to the extent that the Claimant was entitled to 1.5 days' accrued but untaken annual leave at the effective date of termination, 23 December 2023. The Respondent was ordered to pay GBP 187.50 for that accrued but untaken annual leave by way of unpaid wages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for an unauthorised deduction of wages consisting of a week's pay for 23 to 30 December 2023 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the unauthorised deduction of wages claim was well founded only to the extent of 1.5 days' accrued but untaken annual leave as at 23 December 2023. | Upheld | — | £188 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £188
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.