Case 3200525/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Nur v Draughts Limited and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200525/2025
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr A Nur
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 5 August 2025, Employment Judge Gardiner considered the claimant's application for interim relief in case 3200525/2025. The tribunal recorded that the application had been made before the end of the period of seven days immediately following the effective date of termination, and on that basis held that it had jurisdiction to consider the request.
The tribunal then refused the claimant's application for interim relief under section 161(1) of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under section 161(1) of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was refused. The tribunal first held that it had jurisdiction because the application was made before the end of the seven-day period immediately following the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.161(1) Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.