Case 3200529/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Michael Ian Rooke v Executive & Business Aviation Support Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200529/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michael Ian Rooke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Michael Ian Rooke against Executive & Business Aviation Support Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £7,735.70. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £16,500.00 damages, and that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,725.00.
The tribunal further ordered payment of £1,597.93 for unpaid pension contributions and £3,704.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment states that the respondent must pay £33,632.63 in total in respect of the claims. The numbered amounts in the judgment do not arithmetically match that total, so the figures are recorded as stated in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £7,735.70 as the gross/net sum. | Upheld | — | £7,736 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards £16,500.00 damages. | Upheld | — | £16,500 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,725.00. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Other | The judgment records a failure to pay pension contributions and orders payment of £1,597.93, but it does not label this element as a breach of contract or wages deduction claim. | Upheld | — | £1,598 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,704.00. | Upheld | — | £3,704 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £33,633
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.