Case 3200532/2022 · Employment Tribunal
A Diallo v Smoke & Mercy Limited (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200532/2022
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Diallo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 23 August 2022, Employment Judge F Allen dealt with a claim by A Diallo against Smoke & Mercy Limited (in liquidation). The judgment records that the respondent name was substituted to Basit Nasim/Smoke & Mercy Limited under rule 34 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and that the claim against Basit Nasim was dismissed after the claimant withdrew that part of the claim.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Diallo a gross sum of £1,353.25 for accrued but untaken holiday, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance contributions. No separate award for basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Gross sum ordered for accrued but untaken holiday, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance contributions. The judgment also records that the claim against Basit Nasim was dismissed after the claimant withdrew that part of the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,353 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,353
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.