Case 3200543/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Bishop v Hodgson Automotive Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200543/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Bishop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 October 2019, the Tribunal gave Miss K Bishop an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably in failing to respond to the Respondent’s disclosure request, that the claimant was in breach of the Tribunal’s order dated 17 July 2019, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gardiner ordered that the claim be struck out. The hearing listed for 4, 5 and 6 March 2020 was vacated as a result. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s). The only adjudication recorded is that the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.