Case 3200549/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Abbey Prior v Sonia A Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200549/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Abbey Prior
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 9 August 2022 was conducted remotely before Employment Judge Travers. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. By email dated 2 August 2022, the respondent did not dispute liability or the schedule of loss sent on 29 April 2022, and the tribunal had directed on 6 August 2022 that the matter would proceed as a remedy hearing.
The tribunal awarded Abbey Prior £9,891.34 in total. The unfair dismissal award was made up of a basic award of £3,808.00, based on 8 years' service and a gross weekly figure of £600 with the statutory cap applying, plus a compensatory award.
The compensatory award included £918.44 for two weeks without a job, £3,746.50 for the difference between the net salary in the old and new job over 50 weeks, and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal also awarded £918.40 for holiday pay, calculated as 10 days at £91.84. The judgment does not set out any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded at the remedy hearing. The unfair dismissal award comprised a basic award of £3,808.00 and a compensatory award made up of £918.44 for two weeks without a job, £3,746.50 for the difference between the net salary in the old and new job over 50 weeks, and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £8,973 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as a separate line item in the remedy breakdown, calculated as 10 days x £91.84. | Upheld | — | £918 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,891
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,808
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,165
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.