Case 3200550/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wolny v Marsand Bespoke Furniture Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200550/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wolny
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Wolny, brought a claim against Marsand Bespoke Furniture Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages. The matter was heard by Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson at East London Hearing Centre by telephone on 27 September 2021. The respondent was not represented and did not attend.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and allowed it. The judgment does not set out any disputed factual findings beyond that conclusion, and no separate liability issues are recorded in the extracted text.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £774.36. The judgment explains that this figure comprised £732 unpaid overtime plus interest at 8% per annum from the date payment was due to the date of hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal allowed the claim for unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £774.36, described as £732 unpaid overtime plus interest at 8% per annum to the date of hearing. | Upheld | — | £774 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £774
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.