Ms S Begum v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2021

Case reference: 3200559/2019
Decision date: 28 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gardiner Members
Venue: East London Hearing Centre
Panel members: Mrs B Saund, Mrs G Forrest

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms S Begum

Respondent

Barts Health NHS Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal sat at East London Hearing Centre on 22, 23 and 24 June 2021 before Employment Judge Gardiner with members Mrs B Saund and Mrs G Forrest.

The judgment records that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded. Accordingly, the Tribunal dismissed the claim. No remedy was awarded in the judgment text supplied.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints are not well founded and that her claim is dismissed. The gov.uk listing categories identify Disability Discrimination and Race Discrimination, but the short judgment text does not separately describe each complaint.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints are not well founded and that her claim is dismissed. The gov.uk listing categories identify Disability Discrimination and Race Discrimination, but the short judgment text does not separately describe each complaint.	Dismissed	Race	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.