Case 3200560/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Twidell v High Star Energy and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200560/2023
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Venue
- East London East Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs A Twidell
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case, Mrs A Twidell v High Star Energy and others, was heard at East London East Hearing Centre on 17 August 2023 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green. The claimant was not present or represented, and the respondents were also not present or represented.
The judgment states that the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and failed to explain the reason for the absence. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 47. No substantive findings on the underlying employment issues are recorded in the judgment.
The judgment does not record any remedy, liability findings on the merits, or split award between claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and did not explain the absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and did not explain the absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.