Case 3200568/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Vivian Elliott v Gray’s Baptist Pre-School — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200568/2019
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Vivian Elliott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Vivian Elliott brought a claim against Gray’s Baptist Pre-School for a redundancy payment. The case was heard at East London Employment Tribunal on 16 September 2019 before Employment Judge Burgher, and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the claimant earned £207 per week and had 21 full years of service, treated as 20 years for the redundancy calculation. It also found that 17 of those years were years in which she was over 41 years of age.
Applying that calculation, the tribunal awarded 3 x £207 = £621.00 and 17 x 1.5 x £207 = £5,278.50, producing a total redundancy entitlement of £5,899.50. The respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. It found that she earned £207 per week and had 21 full years of service, capped at 20 years for the calculation, including 17 years when she was over 41. It calculated the redundancy payment as £621.00 for the first 3 years and £5,278.50 for the remaining 17 years, giving a total of £5,899.50. | Upheld | — | £5,900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.