Case 3200569/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Johnathan Seymour v Eco Build Partners Ltd T/A Senergy Direct FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200569/2023
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Johnathan Seymour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Rule 21 final hearing on 13 July 2023, held in private by video and with no appearance from either party, Employment Judge S Shore recorded that the claimant had submitted an offer letter from the respondent dated 4 January 2023 and a payslip dated 24 February 2023. On that basis, the tribunal said it had sufficient information to deal with the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and it amended the respondent's name to Eco Build Partners Ltd trading as Senergy Direct.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,288.46 gross, calculated as 17 days' pay at £134.61 per day for the period 6 February 2023 to 28 February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as 17 days' pay at £134.61 per day for the period 6 February 2023 to 28 February 2023, gross without deduction of income tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,288
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.