Case 3200588/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y S Butt v Mr Sunny Arora and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200588/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Y S Butt
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims against Mr Sunny Arora were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, and the claims proceeded against SHOP321 Ltd. The tribunal held that the Claimant's average hourly rate of pay for the duration of his employment with the Second Respondent was below the National Minimum Wage and that this was in breach of his contract of employment. It found total loss of £37,627.10 gross on that head, but capped the award at £25,000.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The Claimant had 7 years' complete service when his employment ended on 28 November 2020, and he was 60 years old at dismissal. The tribunal recorded an adjusted average weekly pay of £610.40, noted that the statutory cap on a week's pay was £538 at the time the claim was submitted, and awarded a basic award of £5,649.00 and a compensatory award of £3,865.99. The compensatory award covered loss of earnings from 28 November 2020 to 30 January 2021, adjusted for National Minimum Wage, and loss of statutory rights, with credit for £1,000 already paid by the Second Respondent.
The holiday pay claim for 26 February 2020 to 28 April 2020 succeeded and £5,315.00 was awarded. The tribunal also found that SHOP321 Ltd failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded two weeks' pay of £1,076, and that it failed to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996, making a declaration to that effect. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were said to apply; the prescribed period was 28 November 2020 to 30 January 2021 and the prescribed element was £3,865.99. The judgment states total compensation of £40,905.09.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was that the Claimant's average hourly rate of pay for the duration of his employment with SHOP321 Ltd was below the National Minimum Wage and in breach of contract. The tribunal found total loss of £37,627.10 gross, capped the award at £25,000, and ordered that sum against the Second Respondent. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | The Claimant had 7 years' complete service and was 60 when dismissed on 28 November 2020. The tribunal used an adjusted average weekly pay of £610.40, noted the statutory cap on a week's pay was £538 at the time of the claim, and awarded a basic award of £5,649.00 and a compensatory award of £3,865.99, with credit for £1,000 already paid. Paragraph 7 records total compensation of £40,905.09. | Upheld | — | £9,515 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for the period 26 February 2020 to 28 April 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,315 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the Second Respondent did not provide a written statement of particulars of employment as required by section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the Second Respondent did not provide itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 and made a declaration to that effect. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,905
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,649
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,866
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.