Case 3200589/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Morrison v Dr B Ighorodje — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200589/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tobin, sitting alone at the East London Hearing Centre on 22 August 2019, heard the claimant's claims for a shortfall in redundancy pay and for breach of contract arising from non-payment of notice pay. Both claims succeeded.
The tribunal awarded £1,928.17 for the outstanding redundancy payment and £3,618.00 for notice pay, making a total award of £5,546.17. The judgment records that the notice pay figure was a gross payment, and that the respondent may deduct tax and National Insurance if written confirmation is provided to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal upheld the claim for the shortfall in the claimant's redundancy payment and awarded £1,928.17 for outstanding redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,928 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the claim for breach of contract, identified as payment in lieu of notice not given, and awarded £3,618.00 as notice pay. The judgment states this was a gross payment and that tax and National Insurance may be deducted if written confirmation is provided to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £3,618 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,546
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.