Case 3200593/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Roberts v Valley Floors Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3200593/2021
- Decision date
- 12 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre hearing on 7 January 2022, Employment Judge B Elgot gave judgment on Mr J Roberts's claim against Valley Floors Limited. The tribunal succeeded only on accrued and unpaid holiday pay, recording that the calculation of outstanding holiday pay was agreed by the respondent and ordering payment of £1,108.98 within 28 days.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It also dismissed the claimant's breach of contract claim for alleged unpaid 'store commission' in the sum of £4,280.
The respondent's contractual counterclaim for £5,000 in relation to missing stock was also dismissed. The only monetary award recorded in the judgment was the holiday pay sum of £1,108.98.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued and unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal recorded that the calculation of outstanding holiday pay was agreed by the respondent and ordered payment of £1,108.98 within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £1,109 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's breach of contract claim for alleged unpaid 'store commission' in the sum of £4,280 did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contractual counterclaim for £5,000 in relation to missing stock did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,109
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.