Case 3200602/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Letitia Green v QH The Cedars Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200602/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Letitia Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after QH The Cedars Limited failed to file an ET3 within the time limit. The tribunal considered the information provided by Miss Letitia Green and held that the claim succeeded.
The only substantive finding recorded was that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £594.00, said to relate to 72 hours worked at £8.25 per hour, subject to any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance.
No other causes of action, legal tests, or additional remedy components were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered after the respondent failed to present an ET3 within the time limit. The tribunal found the claim succeeded and ordered payment of £594.00 for 72 hours worked at £8.25 per hour, less any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £594
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.