Case 3200608/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Tristan Coull v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200608/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tristan Coull
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought a constructive unfair dismissal claim based on the Respondent's handling of his request to progress a formal grievance. The Tribunal found that the Respondent did not refuse, disregard, ignore or obstruct the grievance procedure on 19 December 2023, 22 December 2023 or 1 January 2024, but did breach its own policy from 5 January 2024 and continued to delay the formal grievance process thereafter.
The Tribunal held that the breach of the grievance policy was not sufficient to amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. It found that the Respondent was still trying to resolve the issues and get the Claimant back to work, and that preparations for a formal grievance were underway, albeit slow and late.
In the alternative, the Tribunal found that the Claimant resigned because of the conduct of Mr Berrow, not because of any failure to allow or progress a formal grievance about that conduct. The constructive unfair dismissal claim therefore failed. The unlawful deduction from wages and discrimination claims had been withdrawn before the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was withdrawn on 7 August 2024. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as constructive unfair dismissal and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that discrimination claims were withdrawn on 7 August 2024, but does not identify a protected characteristic or a more specific discrimination claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- Malik test
- Blackburn v Aldi Stores Limited
- Woods v WM Car Services
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- United First Partners Research v Carreras
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.