Case 3200618/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Louis Tshimuanga v East London NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200618/2019
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Louis Tshimuanga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the remaining and later claims and dismissed the proceedings. It held that there was no reasonable prospect of the claimant establishing that colleagues colluded against him because he was Congolese, or that any aspect of the respondent's handling of the matter had any connection with race or nationality.
The judgment relied on the undisputed background that the claimant had been convicted of assaulting a patient, his appeal against conviction had failed, and he had later been struck off by the Nursing and Midwifery Council. In that context, the tribunal found there was no prospect of a viable challenge to the fairness of the dismissal or appeal outcome on the bases advanced.
As to the remaining allegations about continued suspension and delay in convening the disciplinary hearing, the tribunal found no financial detriment because the claimant remained on full pay, and considered suspension inevitable while the criminal case was unresolved. It concluded that the later claims merely recycled matters already struck out under new headings and that all of the claims before it had no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | This judgment addresses allegations said to relate to the claimant's race/nationality, including suspension, delay in the disciplinary process, and appeal-related complaints. The text does not support separate sex discrimination findings in this judgment, and the earlier age claim is described as already struck out before this hearing. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)
- Malik v Birmingham City Council & Anor [2019] UKEAT 0027
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.